The headline from the MSNBC.com read, "Men Rule-at least in workplace attitude." It was the first of a series of articles on MSNBC's and Elle Magazine's Survey on Work and Power Survey. where they interviewed about 60,000 people.
Despite the potentially inflammatory headline, it did not create a blogging firestorm. In fact, it created somewhat of a blogging backlash.
Talkwench, wasn't buying their argument.
[The] major message of it is that the gender of the boss does not matter for the majority
of the respondents. But because more people prefer a male boss to a
female boss the article then veers into the question of what might be
wrong with female bosses. Note
that we don't really get a discussion anywhere on what might be wrong
with male bosses (or what might be good with female bosses), and so the
comments begin with the assumption (unstated) that male bosses are
good, and that all one needs to do is to point out the worst possible
characteristics of female bosses to compare them to the good male boss.
Although some comments later diverge from this, the topic is not set up
as a neutral one, and it is not surprising that we don't get a balanced
discussion. Journalist Eve Tahmincioglu writes about careers on MSNBC.com and is author of From the Sandbox to the Corner Office: Lessons Learned on the Journey to the Top. www.sandboxbook.com. She recently chatted with me about the survey and why she believes the 51% who said they didn't care if they had a male or female boss were simply being "PC."
"The smart Echidne analyzes the survey -- and the many negative comments about women that follow the story -- and pulls out what's truly important here:
This is cross-posted at Blogher
Recent Comments