
Publicly NBC and CBS are saying they gave Don Imus the boot because they couldn't tolerate his racist and misogynistic remarks.
Hmmm.. if timing is interesting, it was very interesting that NBC fired Imus on a day when advertiser after advertiser jumped ship.
NBC says their only reason for firing Imus was that employees didn't want to work for an organization that condoned such hateful remarks.
Well, anyone who watched Imus' show on a regular basis --and I watched it very regularly-- knows that he was constantly saying things that most people would find misogynistic, and racist. Surely those employees who were outraged over his remarks last week had expressed this outrage before.
There were certainly amble opportunities for them to say-- 'why are we as a news organization featuring this kind of humor? 'Chances are they did. If someone could get their hands on internal emails, would anyone be surprised if over the past five years management has received many emails protesting Imus and his brand of humor?
So why did management pay attention now? Despite what they say about listening to their employees the facts say something different --their advertisers started getting nervous. and pulling those wonderful advertising dollars off their networks.
The track record of this program defies any other explanation. Management may have been uncomfortable but they were uncomfortable all the way to the bank. They knew about his style of humor and they either liked it or simply turned a blind eye because he was a money making machine.
Had the advertisers not launched a mutiny the networks probably would have listened to the outraged employees and made a commitment that Imus would be watched and no future racist remarks would be tolerated. But, he would have come back from his suspension.
And what about the advertisers? They had to know about the so-called humor on Imus' show. They suddenly were experiencing outrageous indignation? As John Stossel would say, " Give Me A Break."
The advertisers ignored Imus' track record because he delivered. More than a few journalists are now sheepishly having to give a public mea culpe that they enabled the behavior by coming on his program and not staying away in protest of the humor.
The roster of guests is a who who in politicians and journalists: Presidential hopeful John McCain, Senator Joe Leiberman, Former Congressman Harold Ford. Journalist Tim Russett. David Gregory. Andrea Mitchell. The editors and senior executives of Newsweek ,and former blogger Ana Marie Cox.
Before CBS fired Imus, Ana Marie Cox - a former blogger who now has a gig at TIME, wrote:
"Every time I've been on Don Imus' show, he has reminded listeners that
he "discovered" me. It's not exactly hyperbole. He first invited me on
when I was just a foulmouthed blogger who ran the gossipy political
site Wonkette. As I recall, my first on-air conversation with him was
about the Bush twins, or, as I called them, "Jenna and Not-Jenna." Last
fall I became a regular guest and took up slightly more serious topics
(on my last appearance we talked about Senator John McCain's Baghdad
trip and Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani's lack of
social graces), but the subjects hardly mattered. I had been invited
inside the circle, and to be perfectly honest, I was thrilled to be
there.
As the invites kept coming, I found myself succumbing to the clubhouse
mentality that Imus both inspires and cultivates. Sure, I cringed at
his and his crew's race-baiting (the Ray Nagin impersonations, the
Obama jokes) and at the casual locker-room misogyny (Hillary Clinton's
a "bitch," CNN news anchor Paula Zahn is a "wrinkled old prune"), but I
told myself that going on the show meant something beyond inflating my
precious ego. I wasn't alone. As Frank Rich noted a few years ago,
"It's the only show ... that I've been on where you can actually talk
in an informed way — not in sound bites." Yeah, what he said!
Right leaning bloggers are not so impressed with Cox's mea culpe. The Right Wing News wrote,
Ana Marie Cox is best known for faux lesbian shots and talking about anal sex. But, now she's gleefully slamming a shiv into the back of someone who helped her career because he said something controversial. Why? So she can pretend that it's some sort of moral stand as opposed to cold calculation about what would be most helpful for her career,
The Riehl World View had this to say,
Shorter Ana Marie Cox - If I didn't have this Time gig, I'd still be kissing his ass ... and loving it.
What a worthless, unprincipled bitch.
I don't even like Imus, but Cox shows all the loyalty you'd expect from
a liberal at a flag waving ceremony and I find that distasteful,
regardless of the personalities involved.
Ironic isn't it? The blogger denounces Cox and manages to use sexist language in his rant. How perfect is that? FYI, bitch,like 'ho , is a sexist term.
If NBC is so outraged at sexist remarks, how can it still keep The Apprendice on the air? Certainly Donald Trump's vicious personal attacks against Rosie O'Donnell crossed a l mysogynstic line?
If media giants now say racist and sexist language is no longer
acceptable, where will we see these policies so we can understand when
they are and aren't being enforced?
Recent Comments