The book could have been a best-seller. With one twist. If the sales of the "confession" had been targeted to the families of the victims rather than the family of the murderer.
If the Goldmans and the Browns would have "profited" from this hypothetical confession then people would have raced out to read the book-- happily.
If News Corp. had simply matched any payments to Simpson dollar to dollar to the Goldmans and Brown families, people still would have bought the book and watched the TV special.
But they didn't do that. And, that's what the outcry is all about . It's not that its a hypothetical confession. It's not about the money. It's about who was getting the money.
Had the victims been included in the financial arrangement in any sort of way, the media would have gleefully done rounds of interviews hyping it as an inside look into the minds of a sociopath--as finally uncovering "The Truth" about the murders that launched the trial of the century.
The Media would have reminded us ad nauseum that a portion of every book sale was going to the Goldmans and Browns. The media would have felt clean and very self righteous that they were somehow helping put money into the pocket of the people who lost their loved ones on that June evening in 1994.
If the money were going to the families of the victims rather than just the murderer than we would be living with OJ Said He Did It all day ,every day, from now until Christmas.
All this outrage would have turned into a media frenzy of "a fascinating look into the mind of a sociopath."
As Bookninja writes about Rupert Murdoch's apology,
"...they don't actually give a rat's ass about the families and if they
thought they could get away with it, they'd have done it in a second.
It was only the collective gagging and anger that made any impact. This
was as calculated a retraction and apology as a motor company recall.
It only became an "ill-considered" book once the risk analysts realised
they had more to lose from the bad press than from pulping the run."
Clinton Fein blogs about the first amendment on The First:First Amendment Project's Weblog and takes issue with how the media reported the entire episode.
Even I, on Annoy.com, took News Corp. to task, but not with the kind of
hypocrisy that the holier-than-thous at MSNBC and CNN et al. saw fit to
cover the story. Taking a graphic image of Nicole Brown Simpson lying
in a pool of blood, her slashed throat covered by a promo of O.J. s new
book and the News Corp. logo and tag line, mocking Judith Regan’s claim
of domestic abuse solidarity and whitening her skin in much the same
way Time magazine had once made O.J.’s darker, the piece was titled,
using the same font as the book, If We Had Ethics.
The irony is that I am posing the question as much to myself as I’m
applying it to News Corp. After all, we are exploiting a tragedy in
almost the identical, gratuitous way. The main difference though, is
that ours is a commentary, and we aren’t making any money from it.
It is reported that Simpson's family has already been paid. Some reports say they were paid $3.5 million towards their education.
And as other bloggers have commented, it won't be too long before the now canceled book finds its way on eBay.
Image Credit: Annoy.com
Recent Comments